000 | 01974nam a22002537a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | ZW-GwMSU | ||
005 | 20250319114651.0 | ||
008 | 250319b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
022 | _a09743626 | ||
040 |
_aMSU _bEnglish _cMSU _erda |
||
050 | 0 | 0 | _aQD31 JOU |
100 | 1 |
_aKaur, Damanjit _eauthor |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aTheoretical characterization of hydrogen bonding interactions between RCHO (R = H, CN, CF3, OCH3, NH2) and HOR′(R′ = H, Cl, CH3, NH2, C(O)H, C6H5) / _ccreated by Damanjit Kaur and Rajinder Kaur |
264 | 1 |
_aBangalore : _bSprinter, _c2015. |
|
336 |
_2rdacontent _atext _btxt |
||
337 |
_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn |
||
338 |
_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc |
||
440 |
_aJournal of chemical sciences _vVolume 127, number 7, |
||
520 | 3 | _aIn this work, density functional theory and ab initio molecular orbital calculations were used to investigate the hydrogen bonded complexes of type RCHO ⋯HOR′ (R = H, CN, CF 3, OCH 3, NH 2, R′ H, Cl, CH 3, NH 2, C(O)H, C 6H 5) employing 6-31 ++g** and cc-pVTZ basis sets. Thus, the present work considers how the substituents at both the hydrogen bond donor and acceptor affect the hydrogen bond strength. From the analysis, it is reflected that presence of –OCH 3 and –NH 2 substituents at RCHO greatly strengthen the stabilization energies, while –CN and –CF 3 decrease the same with respect to HCHO as hydrogen bond acceptor. The highest stabilization results in case of (H 2N)CHO as hydrogen bond acceptor. The variation of the substituents at –OH functional group also influences the strength of hydrogen bond; nearly all the substituents increase the stabilization energy relative to HOH. The analysis of geometrical parameters; proton affinities, charge transfer, electron delocalization studies have been carried out. | |
650 |
_aHydrogen bond _vCarbonyl _xSubstituent effect |
||
700 | 1 |
_aKaur, Rajinder _eco author |
|
856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12039-015-0885-z | ||
942 |
_2lcc _cJA |
||
999 |
_c169390 _d169390 |