000 | 01760nam a22002537a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | ZW-GwMSU | ||
005 | 20250305075103.0 | ||
008 | 250305b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
022 | _a00935301 | ||
040 |
_aMSU _bEnglish _cMSU _erda |
||
050 | 0 | 0 | _aHF5415.3 JOU |
100 | 1 |
_aPalmeira, Mauricio M. _eauthor |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aFree offer ≠ cheap product : _ba selective accessibility account on the valuation of free offers / _ccreated by Mauricio M. Palmeira and Joydeep Srivastava |
264 | 1 |
_aOxford : _bOxford University Press, _c2013. |
|
336 |
_2rdacontent _atext _btxt |
||
337 |
_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn |
||
338 |
_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc |
||
440 |
_aJournal of consumer research _vVolume 40, number 4, |
||
520 | 3 | _aMany consumer price promotions (including new product launches) offer a product for free or for a low, discounted price along with a required purchase. This research demonstrates that consumers' willingness to pay for the product after the promotion is retracted is higher when it was offered for free than when it was offered at a low, discounted price. The underlying reasoning is that the price of the product on promotion is used as a natural anchor for value estimation. However, when the product is offered for free (i.e., zero price), consumers are less likely to consider the value of the product and are influenced by anchors such as the price of the focal purchase. In contrast to some prior findings, a free offer does not devalue the product at all and, at a minimum, devalues the product less than if it were offered for a low, discounted price. | |
650 |
_aLow-cost strategy _vWillingness to pay |
||
700 | 1 |
_aSrivastava, Joydeep _eco author |
|
856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1086/671565 | ||
942 |
_2lcc _cJA |
||
999 |
_c169134 _d169134 |