000			02058nam a22002537a 4500
003			ZW-GwMSU
005			20250228124742.0
008			250228b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
022			_a00935301
040			_aMSU _bEnglish _cMSU _erda
050	0	0	_aHF5415.3 JOU
100	1		_aMartin, Kelly D. _eauthor
245	1	0	_aLife satisfaction, self-determination, and consumption adequacy at the bottom of the pyramid / _ccreated by Kelly D. Martin and Ronald Paul Hill
264	1		_aOxford : _bOxford University Press, _c2013.
336			_2rdacontent _atext _btxt
337			_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn
338			_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc
440			_aJournal of consumer research _vVolume 40, number ,
520	3		_aConcentration on consumption in material environments characterized by too much rather than too little creates important gaps in the understanding of how much of the earth’s population navigates the marketplace. This study investigates bottom-of-the-pyramid, or impoverished, consumers to better comprehend the relationship between societal poverty and individual life satisfaction as moderated by psychological need deprivation and described by self-determination theory. Data were gathered from more than 77,000 individuals in 51 of the world’s poorest countries. Using hierarchical linear models, results show that relatedness and autonomy improve poverty’s negative influence on life satisfaction, but only if basic life necessities are available, described as consumption adequacy. Findings illustrate that without consumption adequacy, psychological need fulfillment has little effect on the poverty–well-being relationship, emphasizing the hopelessness of individuals living in extreme poverty. Findings also suggest to researchers that impoverished consumers not only face different circumstances but actually respond to those circumstances in unique ways.
650			_aSatisfaction _vLow income _xQuality of life
700	1		_aHill, Ronald Paul _eco author
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1086/661528
942			_2lcc _cJA
999			_c169069 _d169069