000			01818nam a22002417a 4500
003			ZW-GwMSU
005			20241216093754.0
008			241216b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
022			_a00935301
040			_aMSU _bEnglish _cMSU _erda
050	0	0	_aHF5415.3 JOU
100	1		_aDommer, Sara Loughran _eauthor
245	1	0	_aExplaining the endowment effect through ownership : _bthe role of identity, gender, and self-threat/ _ccreated by Sara Loughran Dommer and Vanitha Swaminathan
264	1		_aOxford : _bOxford University Press, _c2013.
336			_2rdacontent _atext _btxt
337			_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn
338			_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc
440			_aJournal of consumer research _vVolume 39, number 5,
520	3		_aThe price people are willing to pay for a good is often less than the price they are willing to accept to give up the same good, a phenomenon called the endowment effect. Loss aversion has typically accounted for the endowment effect, but an alternative explanation suggests that ownership creates an association between the item and the self, and this possession-self link increases the value of the good. To test the ownership account, this research examines three moderators that theory suggests should affect the possession-self link and consequently the endowment effect: self-threat, identity associations of a good, and gender. After a social self-threat, the endowment effect is strengthened for in-group goods among both men and women but is eliminated for out-group goods among men (but not women). These results are consistent with a possession-self link explanation and therefore suggest that ownership offers a better explanation for the endowment effect.
700	1		_aSwaminathan, Vanitha _eco author
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1086/666737
942			_2lcc _cJA
999			_c168893 _d168893