000			02979nam a22002777a 4500
003			ZW-GwMSU
005			20241212100900.0
008			241212b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
022			_a00218596
040			_aMSU _bEnglish _cMSU _erda
050	0	0	_aS3 JOU
100	1		_aFrancaviglia, D. _eauthor
245	1	0	_aFruit yield and quality responses of apple cvars Gala and Fuji to partial rootzone drying under Mediterranean conditions/ _ccreated by D. Francaviglia, V. Farina, G. Avellone and R. Lo Bianco
264	1		_aCambridge : _bCambridge University Press, _c2013.
336			_2rdacontent _atext _btxt
337			_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn
338			_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc
440			_aJournal of agricultural science _vVolume 151, number 4
520	3		_ancreasing irrigation efficiency is a major goal for fruit production in dry Mediterranean environments. The present study was conducted in three consecutive years (2007–09) under typical Mediterranean conditions and tested the effect of partial rootzone drying (PRD) on yield and fruit quality of two apple cultivars: Gala, with fruit maturing in summer and Fuji, with fruit maturing in autumn. Three irrigation treatments were imposed: conventional irrigation (CI), PRD (0·50 of CI water on one side of the rootzone, which was alternated periodically) and continuous deficit irrigation (DI, 0·50 of CI water on both sides of the rootzone). During the 2008 and 2009 irrigation seasons, DI reduced tree water status, and to some extent soil moisture, compared with CI and PRD. In all the years and both cultivars, DI reduced crop load by 11 and 5% over CI and PRD, respectively. In cvar Fuji, DI reduced production per tree by 9% and yield efficiency by 16% compared with CI. In all years for cvar Gala and in 2 of the 3 years for cvar Fuji, PRD and DI increased fruit soluble solid content by 5–6%, whereas PRD improved peel colour only in cvar Fuji and in 2 of the 3 years. In cvar Gala, DI fruit showed 27% more sorbitol and 55% more sucrose than PRD fruit. In both cultivars, PRD determined greater marketable yield and profit than DI. Irrigation water productivity (IWP) was increased by both PRD and DI, and in Fuji, PRD induced 18% greater IWP than DI. The different responses of the two cultivars to irrigation treatments can be attributed to differences in canopy size, crop load and mostly to the different timing of fruit growth. In particular, undergoing fast fruit growth during the irrigation period seems to induce permanent yield reductions in DI (but not PRD) trees of cvar Fuji, whereas water deficit during late fruit growth and lower crop load may have cancelled the negative effect of DI in the smaller trees of cvar Gala.
650			_aMediterranean climate _vProduction quality _xApples
700	1		_aFarina, V. _eco author
700	1		_aAvellone, G. _eco author
700	1		_aBianco, R. Lo _eco author
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859612000718
942			_2lcc _cJA
999			_c168834 _d168834