000 01839nam a22002657a 4500
003 ZW-GwMSU
005 20241205093650.0
008 241205b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
022 _a0144-3410
040 _aMSU
_bEnglish
_cMSU
_erda
050 0 0 _aLB1051 EDU
100 1 _aSchilling, Susanne R.
_eauthor
245 1 0 _aFamilies with gifted adolescents
_ccreated by Susanne R. Schilling, Jörn Sparfeldt and Detlef H. Rost
264 1 _aOxfordshire:
_bTaylor and Francis,
_c2005.
336 _2rdacontent
_atext
_btxt
337 _2rdamedia
_aunmediated
_bn
338 _2rdacarrier
_avolume
_bnc
440 _aAn international journal of experimental educational psychology
_vVolume 26 , number 1,
520 3 _aStudies of families with gifted adolescents have revealed conflicting results. Adolescents, mothers, and fathers of 84 families with a gifted adolescent and of 95 families with a non‐gifted adolescent evaluated their family system independently. Dependent variables were cohesion, democratic family style (adaptability), organisation, achievement orientation, communication, and intellectual‐cultural orientation. Neither statistically nor practically significant relationships between giftedness and family system variables could be observed from the perspectives of the adolescents, the mothers, or the fathers. Contradictory results from other studies can be primarily attributed to their methodological shortcomings, labelling effects, or both. The mean inter‐rater agreement was r = .46 for mothers and fathers, r = .38 for adolescents and mothers, and r = .35 for adolescents and fathers.
650 _aAdolescents
_vMothers
_xAcademically gifted
700 1 _aSparfeldt, Jörn
_eco-author
700 1 _aRost, Detlef H.
_eco-author
856 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1080/01443410500340959
942 _2lcc
_cJA
999 _c168543
_d168543