| 000 | 01391nam a22002537a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | ZW-GwMSU | ||
| 005 | 20241203075546.0 | ||
| 008 | 241203b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 022 | _a0144-3410 | ||
| 040 |
_aMSU _bEnglish _cMSU _erda |
||
| 050 | 0 | 0 | _aLB1051 EDU |
| 100 | 1 |
_aOlive, Melissa. L. _eauthor |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aEffect size calculations and single subject designs _ccreated by Melissa L. Olive and Benjamin W. Smith |
| 264 | 1 |
_aOxfordshire: _bTaylor and Francis, _c2005. |
|
| 336 |
_2rdacontent _atext _btxt |
||
| 337 |
_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn |
||
| 338 |
_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc |
||
| 440 |
_aAn international journal of experimental educational psychology _vVolume 25 , number 2-3, |
||
| 520 | 3 | _aThis study compared visual analyses with five alternative methods for assessing the magnitude of effect with single subject designs. Each method was successful in detecting intervention effect. When rank ordered, each method was consistent in identifying the participants with the largest effect. We recommend the use of the standard mean difference (SMDall) formula and we believe the use of a regression equation for calculating effect size in single subject data should be avoided. | |
| 650 |
_aSingle subject designs _vEffect size _xCalculations |
||
| 700 | 1 |
_aSmith, Benjamin W. _eco-author |
|
| 856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1080/0144341042000301238 | ||
| 942 |
_2lcc _cJA |
||
| 999 |
_c168515 _d168515 |
||