000 | 01697nam a22002297a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | ZW-GwMSU | ||
005 | 20241127093734.0 | ||
008 | 241127b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
022 | _a03128962 | ||
040 |
_aMSU _bEnglish _cMSU _erda |
||
050 | 0 | 0 | _aHD31 AUS |
100 | 1 |
_aAzim, Mohammad I _eauthor |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aCorporate governance mechanisms and their impact on company performance : _ba structural equation model analysis/ _ccreated by Mohammad I. Azim |
264 | 1 |
_aLos Angeles : _bSage, _c2012. |
|
336 |
_2rdacontent _atext _btxt |
||
337 |
_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn |
||
338 |
_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc |
||
440 |
_aAustralian journal of management _vVolume 37, number 3, |
||
520 | 3 | _aThe purpose of this study is to use structural equation modelling (SEM) to investigate the extent to which different monitoring mechanisms – the board and its committees, shareholders and independent auditors – are complements (i.e. a positive covariance) or substitutes (a negative covariance) for each other. The lack of consistent results in previous corporate governance research may be attributable to attention not being paid to monitoring mechanisms’ substitution or complementary relationships. By using SEM, this study concludes that complementary and substitution relationships among monitoring mechanisms are present. Using data from the pre – and post – global financial crisis period, this study explains where such corporate government impacts occurred, the inconsistencies that are evident in previous studies and provides insights into corporate governance practices. | |
650 |
_aCorporate governance _vImpact assessment _xStructural equation model |
||
942 |
_2lcc _cJA |
||
999 |
_c168411 _d168411 |