| 000 | 01944nam a22002657a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | ZW-GwMSU | ||
| 005 | 20241126125257.0 | ||
| 008 | 241126b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 022 | _a1052-4800 | ||
| 040 |
_aMSU _bEnglish _cMSU _erda |
||
| 050 | 0 | 0 | _aLB1778 JOU |
| 100 | 1 |
_aLyon, Julie S. _eauthor |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aMeasuring and improving the climate for teaching: _ba multi-year study _ccreated by Julie S. Lyon, Hilary J. Gettman, Scott P. Roberts and Cynthia E. Shaw |
| 264 | 1 |
_aCanada: _bMiami University, _c2015. |
|
| 336 |
_2rdacontent _atext _btxt |
||
| 337 |
_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn |
||
| 338 |
_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc |
||
| 440 |
_aJournal on excellence in college teaching _vVolume 26, number 1 , |
||
| 520 | 3 | _aAll organizations have "climates" that significantly affect their employees' performance and satisfaction. The authors posit that an academic department's "climate for teaching" (CFT)--or the the extent to which excellent teaching is rewarded, supported, and expected--has a profound impact on the experience of its instructors and on the quality of education they provide. Further, they argue that CFT can be altered by deliberate interventions. To these ends, the authors developed and refined a measure of CFT using a sample of graduate student instructors at a large public university. Additionally, they tested the impact of direct interventions on CFT using a pretest/posttest quasi-experimental design with multiple control groups and showed that the treatment department had significantly higher CFT. They discuss the importance of measuring and monitoring CFT for all types of institutions, especially given the increased expectations for faculty research productivity. | |
| 650 |
_aEducational environment _vTeaching assistants _xGraduate students |
||
| 700 | 1 |
_aGettman, Hilary J. _eco-author |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aRoberts, Scott P. _eco-author |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aShaw, Cynthia E. _eco-author |
|
| 942 |
_2lcc _cJA |
||
| 999 |
_c168400 _d168400 |
||