000 | 01616nam a22002417a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | ZW-GwMSU | ||
005 | 20241125084729.0 | ||
008 | 241125b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
022 | _a1052-4800 | ||
040 |
_aMSU _bEnglish _cMSU _erda |
||
050 | 0 | 0 | _aLB1778 JOU |
100 | 1 |
_aRodriguez, Fernando _eauthor |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aDo college students notice errors in evidence when critically evaluating research findings? _ccreated by Fernando Rodriguez,, Ng Annalyn and Priti Shah |
264 | 1 |
_aCanada: _bMiami University, _c2016. |
|
336 |
_2rdacontent _atext _btxt |
||
337 |
_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn |
||
338 |
_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc |
||
440 |
_aJournal on excellence in college teaching _vVolume 27, number 3 , |
||
520 | 3 | _aThe authors examined college students' ability to critically evaluate scientific evidence, specifically, whether first- and second-year students noticed when poor interpretations were drawn from research evidence. Fifty students evaluated a set of eight psychological studies, first in an informal context, then again in a critical-thinking context. Half of the studies drew poor interpretations of the results--specifically, over-interpreting findings with small effects and inferring causal conclusions from correlational findings. Across both contexts, students noticed when studies over-interpreted small effects, but they were not able to notice when studies contained correlation-not-causation errors. Activities for helping students identify interpretive errors are suggested. | |
650 |
_aCollege students _vEvidence _xCriticism |
||
700 | 1 | _eco-author | |
942 |
_2lcc _cJA |
||
999 |
_c168350 _d168350 |