| 000 | 01749nam a22002537a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | ZW-GwMSU | ||
| 005 | 20241125071857.0 | ||
| 008 | 241125b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 022 | _a03128962 | ||
| 040 |
_aMSU _bEnglish _cMSU _erda |
||
| 050 | 0 | 0 | _aHD31 AUS |
| 100 | 1 |
_aCheng, Mandy Man-sum _eauthor |
|
| 245 | 1 | 4 |
_aThe impact of capital proposal guidelines and perceived preparer biases on reviewers’ investment evaluation decisions/ _ccreated by Mandy M. Cheng and Habib Mahama |
| 264 | 1 |
_aLos Angeles : _bSage, _c2011. |
|
| 336 |
_2rdacontent _atext _btxt |
||
| 337 |
_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn |
||
| 338 |
_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc |
||
| 440 |
_aAustralian journal of management _vVolume 36, number 3 |
||
| 520 | 3 | _aPast literature has highlighted the importance of using reviewers in the evaluation of investment proposals. This study examines whether and how the decisions of these reviewers are influenced by a proposal’s conformance with company guidelines and practices, and the incentives facing the proposal preparer. Our experiment shows that, holding the proposal’s content constant, the reviewers’ evaluation decision is less favourable if the proposal does not follow the company guidelines. Further, we find that the preparer’s incentive to persist in a project negatively affects the proposal reviewers’ decisions only when the proposal deviates from company guidelines but not when it is compliant. This result suggests that company guidelines may lower the willingness of reviewers to make independent decisions. | |
| 650 |
_aInvestment appraisal techniques _vExperimental economics _zAustralia |
||
| 700 | 1 |
_aMahama, Habib _eco author |
|
| 856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0312896211416135 | ||
| 942 |
_2lcc _cJA |
||
| 999 |
_c168345 _d168345 |
||