| 000 | 01749nam a22002777a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | ZW-GwMSU | ||
| 005 | 20241122122136.0 | ||
| 008 | 241122b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 022 | _a1052-4800 | ||
| 040 |
_aMSU _bEnglish _cMSU _erda |
||
| 050 | 0 | 0 | _aLB1778 JOU |
| 100 | 1 |
_aShaw, Mahauganee D. _eauthor |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aUsing faculty preference to identify disciplinary pairs and foster collaboration _ccreated by Mahauganee D. Shaw, Amber D. Dumford, Eddie R. Cole, Thomas F. Nelson Laird and Antwione M. Haywood |
| 264 | 1 |
_aCanada: _bMiami University, _c2015. |
|
| 336 |
_2rdacontent _atext _btxt |
||
| 337 |
_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn |
||
| 338 |
_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc |
||
| 440 |
_aJournal on excellence in college teaching _vVolume 26, number 3 , |
||
| 520 | 3 | _aData from the 2010 administration of the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement were used to identify pairs of disciplines in which faculty want to be compared based on research practices, teaching practices, and perceptions of student engagement in academic activities. The goal of this study was to group disciplines by a method with which faculty agree, an approach that teaching and learning center staffs may use to structure faculty development programs and institutional researchers may use to present assessment data. Fifty-two disciplinary pairs were identified across the three categories. The implications of these findings are presented along with proposed directions for future research. | |
| 650 |
_aPreferences _vCollege faculty _xIntellectual disciplines |
||
| 700 | 1 |
_aDumford, Amber D. _eco-author |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aCole, Eddie R. _eco-author |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aNelson Laird, Thomas F. _eco-author |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aHaywood, Antwione M. _eco-author |
|
| 942 |
_2lcc _cJA |
||
| 999 |
_c168339 _d168339 |
||