000 | 01835nam a22002537a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | ZW-GwMSU | ||
005 | 20241114121004.0 | ||
008 | 241114b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
022 | _a1469-7874 | ||
040 |
_aMSU _bEnglish _cMSU _erda |
||
050 | 0 | 0 | _aLB2300 ACT |
100 | 1 |
_aHunter, Kerry _eauthor |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aMaking disciplinary writing and thinking practices an integral part of academic content teaching _cKerry Hunter and Harry Tse |
264 | 1 |
_aThousand Oaks: _bSage, _c2013. |
|
336 |
_2rdacontent _atext _btxt |
||
337 |
_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn |
||
338 |
_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc |
||
440 |
_aActive learning in higher education _vVolume 14, number 3, |
||
520 | 3 | _aEducators and researchers are increasingly calling for the processes of writing and knowledge construction to be an integral part of disciplinary learning. This article contributes to the literature by presenting an empirical analysis of a programme that was designed to expose students to the complexities of academic practices in conjunction with disciplinary concepts. The impact of the programme was evaluated through analysis of student grades before and after its implementation and student and tutor perception of its effect. Data collected included surveys, interviews and focus groups. The data showed that the programme generated student engagement with the processes of knowledge construction and reflected better thinking in the subject. This was evidenced by effective utilisation of feedback and improved grades in written assignments. The findings suggest that similar programmes are of value potentially to any discipline. | |
650 |
_aAcademic literacies _vAcademic writing _xConstruction of disciplinary knowledge |
||
700 |
_aTse, Harry _eco-author |
||
856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/1469787413498037 | ||
942 |
_2lcc _cJA |
||
999 |
_c168236 _d168236 |