000 | 01995nam a22002537a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | ZW-GwMSU | ||
005 | 20241114093133.0 | ||
008 | 241114b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
022 | _a1469-7874 | ||
040 |
_aMSU _bEnglish _cMSU _erda |
||
050 | _aLB2300 ACT | ||
100 |
_aVan Gaal, Frank _eauthor |
||
245 |
_aThe impact of assessment tasks on subsequent examination performance _ccreated by Frank Van Gaal and Annemieke De Ridder |
||
264 |
_aThousand Oaks: _bSage, _c2013. |
||
336 |
_2rdacontent _atext _btxt |
||
337 |
_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn |
||
338 |
_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc |
||
440 |
_aActive learning in higher education _vVolume , number , |
||
520 | 3 | _aIn this article, the impact of assessment tasks on examination result (measured by examination grades) is investigated. Although many describe the advantages of electronic assessment tasks, few studies have been undertaken which compare a traditional approach using a classical examination with a new approach using assessment tasks. The main hypothesis of this study is that assessment tasks have a positive impact on results. It should motivate students to avoid procrastination and to adopt a deep learning approach. We test this research hypothesis in a case study with undergraduate students in their second year at university. Study results of students before and after the implementation of the assessment tasks are compared using t-tests. A regression analysis is performed to investigate the impact of the assessment tasks on the examination result. Empirical evidence of whether or not a positive effect of assessment tasks on the examination result is presented. The impact of how assessment tasks affect students with differing levels of performance is provided, and implications for educators is offered. | |
650 |
_aAlternative evaluation _vAssessment _xEmpirical analysis |
||
700 | 1 |
_aDe Ridder, Annemieke _eco-author |
|
856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/1469787413498039 | ||
942 |
_2lcc _cJA |
||
999 |
_c168235 _d168235 |