000			01628nam a22002417a 4500
003			ZW-GwMSU
005			20241016083034.0
008			241016b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
022			_a0739456X
040			_aMSU _bEnglish _cMSU _erda
050	0	0	_aNA9000 JOU
100	1		_aHostovsky, Charles _eauthor
245	1	0	_aThe paradox of the rational comprehensive model of planning : _btales from waste management planning in Ontario, Canada/ _ccreated by Charles Hostovsky
264	1		_aThousand Oaks : _bACSP, _c2005.
336			_2rdacontent _atext _btxt
337			_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn
338			_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc
440			_aJournal of planning education and research _vVolume 25, number 4
520	3		_aThis study explores the reasons why the failure to site and implement waste disposal facilities in the United States and Canada has become commonplace, using the example of waste environmental impact assessment (EIA) programs in Ontario, Canada. The inability of governments to site new waste disposal facilities can be traced to a slavish adherence to planning’s most common paradigm, the rational comprehensive model. The article also addresses whether the extensive public consultation programs associated with waste EIAs are effective. The study concludes with a discussion of how the communicative action of planning should be researched in waste management to develop more efficient and less socially divisive planning programs.
650			_aWaste management _vEnvironmental impact assessment _xPlanning theory _zCanada
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X05282831
942			_2lcc _cJA
999			_c167816 _d167816