000 | 01867nam a22002417a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | ZW-GwMSU | ||
005 | 20241015105831.0 | ||
008 | 241015b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
022 | _a0739456X | ||
040 |
_aMSU _bEnglish _cMSU _erda |
||
050 | 0 | 0 | _aNA9000 JOU |
100 | 1 |
_ade Oliveira, José Antônio Puppim _eauthor |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aEnforcing protected area guidelines in Brazil : _bwhat explains participation in the implementation process?/ _ccreated by José Antonio Puppim de Oliveira |
264 | 1 |
_aThousand Oaks : _bACSP, _c2005. |
|
336 |
_2rdacontent _atext _btxt |
||
337 |
_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn |
||
338 |
_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc |
||
440 |
_aJournal of Planning Education and Research _vVolume 24, number 4 |
||
520 | 3 | _aThis article examines key factors that influence the participation of local actors in policy implementation. Specifically, it reviews case studies in the implementation of environmentally protected area (APA) policy at the local level in the state of Bahia, Brazil. The state created various APAs with the expectation that local actors would support the policy enforcement regimes, thereby reducing the need for a dramatic increase in state institutional capacity. As it turned out, local actors provided varying levels of support for the range of enforcement responsibilities. Based on empirical research conducted in seven APAs, this article identifies three principal factors that explain higher engagement by local actors: (1) the objective of the policy intervention at the local level, (2) the number of different localities involved in the same project or program, and (3) the timing of the involvement of local actors in the policy-making and implementation processes. | |
650 |
_aProtected area _vImplementation _xPublic policy _zBrazil |
||
856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X04270196 | ||
942 |
_2lcc _cJA |
||
999 |
_c167778 _d167778 |