000 01658nam a22002537a 4500
003 ZW-GwMSU
005 20241015093155.0
008 241015b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
022 _a03098249
040 _aMSU
_bEnglish
_cMSU
_erda
050 0 0 _aLB14.6 JOU
100 1 _aAdami, Rebecca
_eauthor
245 1 0 _aTestimony and narrative as a political relation:
_bthe question of ethical judgment in education
_ccreated by Rebecca Adami and Marie HÃ¥llander
264 1 _aLondon:
_bBlackwell,
_c2015
336 _2rdacontent
_atext
_btxt
337 _2rdamedia
_aunmediated
_bn
338 _2rdacarrier
_avolume
_bnc
440 _aJournal of Philosophy of Education
_vVolume 49, number 1
520 3 _aIn this article, we explore the role of film in educational settings and argue that testimony and narrative are dependent upon each other for developing ethical judgments. We use the film 12 Angry Men to enhance our thesis that the emotional response that sometimes is intended in using film as testimonies in classrooms requires a specific listening; a listening that puts pupils at risk when they relate testimonies to their own life narratives. The article raises the importance of listening in training narrative ethos in relation to violence witnessed in film. The article contributes by enhancing an understanding of a relational dimension to testimony and narrative, which, in an Arendtian sense, is also put forward as a political relation.
650 _aEthical judgment in education
_vTestimony and narrative
_xPolitical Relation
700 _aHÃ¥llander, Marie
_eauthor
856 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12089
942 _2lcc
_cJA
999 _c167763
_d167763