000			01658nam a22002537a 4500
003			ZW-GwMSU
005			20241015093155.0
008			241015b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
022			_a03098249
040			_aMSU _bEnglish _cMSU _erda
050	0	0	_aLB14.6 JOU
100	1		_aAdami, Rebecca _eauthor
245	1	0	_aTestimony and narrative as a political relation: _bthe question of ethical judgment in education _ccreated by Rebecca Adami and Marie Hållander
264	1		_aLondon: _bBlackwell, _c2015
336			_2rdacontent _atext _btxt
337			_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn
338			_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc
440			_aJournal of Philosophy of Education _vVolume 49, number 1
520	3		_aIn this article, we explore the role of film in educational settings and argue that testimony and narrative are dependent upon each other for developing ethical judgments. We use the film 12 Angry Men to enhance our thesis that the emotional response that sometimes is intended in using film as testimonies in classrooms requires a specific listening; a listening that puts pupils at risk when they relate testimonies to their own life narratives. The article raises the importance of listening in training narrative ethos in relation to violence witnessed in film. The article contributes by enhancing an understanding of a relational dimension to testimony and narrative, which, in an Arendtian sense, is also put forward as a political relation.
650			_aEthical judgment in education _vTestimony and narrative _xPolitical Relation
700			_aHållander, Marie _eauthor
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12089
942			_2lcc _cJA
999			_c167763 _d167763