000 | 01577nam a22002417a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | ZW-GwMSU | ||
005 | 20241014102630.0 | ||
008 | 241014b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
022 | _a0739456X | ||
040 |
_aMSU _bEnglish _cMSU _erda |
||
050 | 0 | 0 | _aNA9000 JOU |
100 | 1 |
_aHoyt, Lorlene M. _eauthor |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aDo business improvement district organizations make a difference? : _bcrime In and around commercial areas in Philadelphia/ _ccreated by Lorlene M. Hoyt |
264 | 1 |
_aThousand Oaks : _bACSP, _c2005. |
|
336 |
_2rdacontent _atext _btxt |
||
337 |
_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn |
||
338 |
_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc |
||
440 |
_aJournal of planning education and research _vVolume 25, number 2 |
||
520 | 3 | _aThe business improvement district (BID) is an international, yet controversial, model for urban revitalization. This article contributes to the BID debate by identifying the theories that underpin the model, developing a conceptual framework that examines the linkages between crime theories and BID services, and—through the use of spatial and statistical methods of analysis—measuring the impact of BID organizations on criminal activity in and around commercial areas. Results show that lower property crime rates differentiate commercial areas with BID organizations from those without BIDs and that the lower rates are not matched by higher crime in surrounding blocks. | |
650 |
_aBusiness improvement districtsspatial statistics _vCrime theory _xSpatial statistics |
||
856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X05279276 | ||
942 |
_2lcc _cJA |
||
999 |
_c167718 _d167718 |