| 000 | 02453nam a22002417a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | ZW-GwMSU | ||
| 005 | 20240815140009.0 | ||
| 008 | 240815b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 022 | _a09697764 | ||
| 040 |
_aMSU _bEnglish _cMSU _erda |
||
| 050 | 0 | 0 | _aHT395 EUR |
| 100 | 1 |
_aPeyroux, Elisabeth _eauthor |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aLegitimating Business Improvement Districts in Johannesburg: _ba discursive perspective on urban regeneration and policy transfer _ccreated by Elisabeth Peyroux |
| 264 | 1 |
_aLondon: _bsage, _c2012 |
|
| 336 |
_2rdacontent _atext _btxt |
||
| 337 |
_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn |
||
| 338 |
_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc |
||
| 440 |
_aEuropean Urban and Regional Studies _vVolume 19, number 2 |
||
| 520 | 3 | _aThis article considers the transfer of the Business Improvement District model to South Africa from a discursive perspective. It examines the ways in which the private sector (property and business owners) has justified the adoption of the model and how it has moulded the concept to Johannesburg’s inner city. Drawing on critical discourse analysis, this article focuses on legitimation strategies, locating them within broader social practices and power relations within the framework of urban revitalization policies implemented after the democratic transition. By focusing on legitimation strategies, and more particularly on their linguistic and semiotic aspects at the micro level, the article shows how the analysis of language use, particularly through a socio-cognitive approach (Van Dijk, 2009), can contribute to uncovering the opinions, attitudes, ideologies, norms and values of social actors. It can also offer insights into a local reinterpretation of a globally circulating model. The comparative analysis of two case studies highlights changing assumptions and attitudes, at least in local rhetoric, and demonstrates how the imported model has been reshaped not only by different discourses associated with various social practices but also by changing policy demands. By considering discourse as an instrument of the social construction of reality as well as an instrument of power and control, the chosen approach also underlines the way in which inequalities are reproduced and maintained in Johannesburg. | |
| 650 |
_aLegitimating Business Improvement _vPerspective on urban regeneration and policy transfer _xJohannesburg _zJohannesburg |
||
| 856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0969776411420034 | ||
| 942 |
_2lcc _cJA |
||
| 999 |
_c166704 _d166704 |
||