000 | 01835nam a22002417a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | ZW-GwMSU | ||
005 | 20240806140228.0 | ||
008 | 240806b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
022 | _a09697764 | ||
040 |
_aMSU _bEnglish _cMSU _erda |
||
050 | 0 | 0 | _aHT395 EUR |
100 |
_aOvervåg, Kjell _eauthor |
||
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aSecond Homes and Maximum Yield in Marginal Land: _bthe Re-Resourcing of Rural Land in Norway _ccreated by Kjell Overvåg |
264 | 1 |
_aLos Angeles: _bsage, _c2010 |
|
336 |
_2rdacontent _atext _btxt |
||
337 |
_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn |
||
338 |
_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc |
||
440 |
_aEuropean Urban and Regional Studies _vVolume , number , |
||
520 | 3 | _aIt is generally argued that commodification of rural areas leads to a change in the rural economy from being based on exploiting the physical environment to being mainly based on exploiting the aesthetical appeal of rural areas. In this article, however, it is revealed that commodification of rural areas in Norway is closely connected with exploitation of the physical environment, including through the re-resourcing of land from marginal agriculture and abandoned industrial sites into second home developments. This re-resourcing has also been an economic driving force for related tourist, housing and infrastructure developments. Politically, it has significantly influenced local power configurations. Simultaneously, external and local actors are commanded by stronger environmental regulations that govern the geography of re-resourcing. This article is based on studies of the municipalities of Ringebu and Kragerø, Norway, using analysis of planning documents and qualitative interviews. | |
650 |
_aSecond Homes and Maximum Yield _vMarginal Land _xRural Land _zNorway |
||
856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0969776409350690 | ||
942 |
_2lcc _cJA |
||
999 |
_c166564 _d166564 |