| 000 | 01893nam a22002657a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | ZW-GwMSU | ||
| 005 | 20240722124946.0 | ||
| 008 | 240722b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 022 | _a09596801 | ||
| 040 |
_aMSU _bEnglish _cMSU _erda |
||
| 050 | 0 | 0 | _aHD8371 EUR |
| 100 | 1 |
_aJohnston, Alison _eauthor |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aSocial partners and the welfare state: _brecalibration, privatization or collectivization of social risks?/ _ccreated by Alison Johnston, Andreas Kornelakis, and Costanza Rodriguez d’Acri |
| 264 | 1 |
_aLondon: _bSage, _c2011. |
|
| 336 |
_2rdacontent _atext _btxt |
||
| 337 |
_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn |
||
| 338 |
_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc |
||
| 440 |
_aEuropean journal of industrial relations _vVolume 17, number 4 |
||
| 520 | 3 | _aWhat has been the extent of welfare state retrenchment? One strand of the comparative political economy literature argues that welfare states have not undergone outright retrenchment, but recalibration. Another strand identifies a shift towards the privatization of risks and increased reliance on the market. Our article seeks to contribute to these debates with an alternative argument: collectivization of social risks. We employ a method of contextualized comparisons, examining three cases of collectivization across diverse contexts: the financing of disability insurance in the Netherlands, training provision for employed and unemployed in Greece, and regulation of atypical contracts in Italy. We conclude by discussing the ensuing political dynamics that the wider relevance of the argument brings to debates in comparative political economy and comparative industrial relations. | |
| 650 |
_aWelfare state _vSocial partners _xPrivatization _zEU countries |
||
| 700 | 1 |
_aKornelakis, Andreas _eco author |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aRodriguez d'Acri, Costanza _eco author |
|
| 856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0959680111420554 | ||
| 942 |
_2lcc _cJA |
||
| 999 |
_c166182 _d166182 |
||