000 | 01597nam a22002417a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | ZW-GwMSU | ||
005 | 20240613123842.0 | ||
008 | 240613b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
022 | _a09596801 | ||
040 |
_aMSU _bEnglish _cMSU _erda |
||
050 | 0 | 0 | _aHD8371 EUR |
100 | 1 |
_aGlover, Judith _eauthor |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aHighly qualified women in the 'New Europe': _bTerritorial sex segregation _ccreated by Judith Glover |
264 | 1 |
_aLondon: _bSage, _c2005 |
|
336 |
_2rdacontent _atext _btxt |
||
337 |
_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn |
||
338 |
_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc |
||
440 |
_aEuropean journal of industrial relations _vVolume 11, number 2 |
||
520 | 3 | _aThe proportion of women in highly qualified scientific employment in central and eastern Europe and the Baltic States (CEEC-10) is higher than in western Europe. However, this relatively high representation is counteracted by unequal access to resources. This is illustrated by a new measure, the ‘honeypot indicator’. The focus of the EU ‘Lisbon strategy’ summit on increasing overall numbers of scientists does little to address the key issues of retention and advancement. Although social closure mechanisms may undermine the employment prospects of highly qualified women, the conclusion is that the accession of the CEEC-10 to the ‘mainstreaming’ of equal opportunities proclaimed by the European Union provides the best hope of improvement for their employment prospects. | |
650 |
_aQualified women _vNew Europe _xTerritorial sex segregation |
||
856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0959680105053965 | ||
942 |
_2lcc _cJA |
||
999 |
_c166114 _d166114 |