000 | 01544nam a22002417a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | ZW-GwMSU | ||
005 | 20240613101930.0 | ||
008 | 240613b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
022 | _a09596801 | ||
040 |
_aMSU _bEnglish _cMSU _erda |
||
050 | 0 | 0 | _aHD8371 EUR |
100 | 1 |
_aFazekas, Zoltán _eauthor |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aInstitutional effects on the presence of trade unions at the workplace: _bmoderation in a multilevel setting/ _ccreated by Zoltán Fazekas |
264 | 1 |
_aLondon: _bSage, _c2011. |
|
336 |
_2rdacontent _atext _btxt |
||
337 |
_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn |
||
338 |
_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc |
||
440 |
_aEuropean journal of industrial relations _vVolume 17, number 2 |
||
520 | 3 | _aPrevious research has found that the presence of a union at a workplace is an important individual-level determinant of union membership. The present article, drawing on a multilevel analysis of 21 European countries, provides further evidence which nuances the conclusions of previous studies by introducing and testing institutional moderation effects. Thus, in countries with Ghent systems, having a union at workplace is less important, since probability of membership is already very high. Conversely, if there are extension mechanisms for collective agreements there is less incentive to join a trade union, and this is not compensated even when there is an active union at the workplace. | |
650 |
_aTrade unionism _vExtension mechanisms _xMultilevel analysis |
||
856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0959680111400897 | ||
942 |
_2lcc _cJA |
||
999 |
_c166100 _d166100 |