000			01693nam a22002537a 4500
003			ZW-GwMSU
005			20240611110434.0
008			240611b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
022			_a09596801
040			_aMSU _bEnglish _cMSU _erda
050	0	0	_aHD8391 EUR
100	1		_aBusemeyer, Marius R. _eauthor
245	1	0	_aPartisan power, economic coordination and variations in vocational training systems in Europe/ _ccreated by Marius R. Busemeyer and Raphaela Schlicht-Schmälzle
264	1		_aLondon: _bSage, _c2014.
336			_2rdacontent _atext _btxt
337			_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn
338			_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc
440			_aEuropean journal of industrial relations _vVolume 20, number 1
520	3		_aThis article explores the variation of vocational education and training systems in European countries. From a survey of experts in 15 European countries, we develop a typology along two dimensions: employer involvement and public commitment. In a second step, we explain the variety of skill formation systems, highlighting the importance of partisan power and economic coordination. The causal argument is applied in three illustrative case studies of Germany, Sweden and the UK. In particular, we argue that a high degree of economic coordination increases the relevance of training relative to academic education. However, differences within the cluster of coordinated market economies are related to different legacies of partisan power in the post-war decades.
650			_aEconomic coordination _xVocational training _zEurope
700	1		_aSchlicht-Schmälzle, Raphaela _eco author
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0959680113512731
942			_2lcc _cJA
999			_c166050 _d166050