000			01752nam a22002417a 4500
003			ZW-GwMSU
005			20240606091106.0
008			240606b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
022			_a16102878
040			_aMSU _bEnglish _cMSU _erda
050	0	0	_aHF135 REV
100	1		_aRazmi, Arslan _eauthor
245	1	0	_aCan the HOSS framework help shed light on the simultaneous growth of inequality and informalization in developing countries?/ _ccreated by Arslan Razmi
264	1		_aHeidelberg: _bSpringer, _c2009.
336			_2rdacontent _atext _btxt
337			_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn
338			_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc
440			_aReview of world economics _vVolume 145, number 2
520	3		_aUsing simple, modified versions of the factor proportions framework, and focusing on structural features within developing economies, this paper attempts to reconcile puzzling developments observed in many post-reform, post-liberalization countries whereby increasing income inequality has emerged side-by-side with informalization of the economy. Measures undertaken to enhance public sector efficiency and attract investment in an import-intensive export sector may increase rental–wage and skilled–unskilled wage gaps, contra the predictions of the simple Heckscher–Ohlin–Stolper–Samuelson (HOSS) framework regarding skill- and capital-scarce countries. The common thread generating our interesting results is the presence of sectors that are even more labor-intensive than those producing traded goods.
650			_aHeckscher–Ohlin–Stolper–Samuelson theory _vElasticity of factor substitution _xInternational production networks _zDeveloping countries
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-009-0017-2
942			_2lcc _cJA
999			_c165952 _d165952