000			01942nam a22002537a 4500
003			ZW-GwMSU
005			20240605121524.0
008			240605b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
022			_a01446193
040			_aMSU _bEnglish _cMSU _erda
050	0	0	_aHD9715.A1 CON
100	1		_aBehm, Michael _eauthor
245	1	0	_aApplication of the Loughborough construction accident causation model: _ba framework for organizational learning _ccreated by Michael Behm and Arthur Schneller
264	1		_aAbingdon: _bTaylor and Francis, _c2013
336			_2rdacontent _atext _btxt
337			_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn
338			_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc
440			_aConstruction Management and Economics _vVolume 31, number 4-6
520	3		_aIn order for the construction industry to improve its poor safety performance it needs to learn from its safety mistakes and put the lessons learned to good use. Incident investigation theories and techniques vary widely in the peer-reviewed literature. The Loughborough Construction Accident Causation (ConAC) model was applied to State Department of Transportation construction accidents, and is proposed as a tool to facilitate organizational learning in the construction industry. Details of the methodology utilized are described so that it can be duplicated in research and in practice. By investigating 27 DOT construction incidents, the research demonstrates how the model can be used both in research and in practice. The model yielded 6.63 causes/factors/influences identified per incident, and correlated the causes to determine relationships. Incident causality is complex and multi-faceted. The Loughborough model facilitates a holistic view of incident causality and thus organizational learning.
650			_aAccident _vOrganizational learning _xSafety _zLoughborough
700			_aSchneller, Arthur _eco-author
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2012.690884
942			_2lcc _cJA
999			_c165925 _d165925