| 000 | 01843nam a22002417a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | ZW-GwMSU | ||
| 005 | 20240604080839.0 | ||
| 008 | 240604b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 022 | _a00221856 | ||
| 040 |
_aMSU _bEnglish _cMSU _erda |
||
| 050 | 0 | 0 | _aHD8391 JOU |
| 100 | 1 |
_aRosewarne, Stuart _eauthor |
|
| 245 | 1 | 4 |
_aThe internationalisation of construction capital and labour force formation: _bunion responses in the transnational enterprise/ _ccreated by Stuart Rosewarne |
| 264 | 1 |
_aLondon: _bSage, _c2013. |
|
| 336 |
_2rdacontent _atext _btxt |
||
| 337 |
_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn |
||
| 338 |
_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc |
||
| 440 |
_aThe journal of industrial relations _vVolume 55, number 2 |
||
| 520 | 3 | _aThroughout much of the advanced industrial world the building and construction industry has been extremely reliant upon migrant workers to meet industry labour force needs. However, changes to work organisation in this sector, such as extended subcontracting chains and the increased significance of ‘phoenix’ operators, have reinforced greater recourse to migrant workers, especially temporary and undocumented workers. Considered in the broader context of the widespread embrace of labour market flexibility and state engagement with neoliberal-oriented labour market policies that include less-restrictive labour migration programs, organised labour has been confronted by new and quite different industrial challenges in responding to migrant workers. This article evaluates the significance of this shifting terrain in the construction sector for unions at the national, international and transnational level in engaging and organising migrant labour. | |
| 650 |
_aBuilding and construction _vUnion behaviour _xInternational labour migration |
||
| 856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0022185612473220 | ||
| 942 |
_2lcc _cJA |
||
| 999 |
_c165864 _d165864 |
||