| 000 | 02495nam a22002777a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | ZW-GwMSU | ||
| 005 | 20240529071256.0 | ||
| 008 | 240529b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 022 | _a01446193 | ||
| 040 |
_aMSU _bEnglish _cMSU _erda |
||
| 050 | _aHD9715. A1 CON | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aGerth, Robert _eauthor |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aDesign for construction: utilizing production experiences in development _ccreated by Robert Gerth, Albert Boqvist, Marcus Bjelkemyr, and Bengt Lindberg |
| 264 | 1 |
_aAbingdon: _bTaylor and Francis, _c2013 |
|
| 336 |
_2rdacontent _atext _btxt |
||
| 337 |
_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn |
||
| 338 |
_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc |
||
| 440 |
_aConstruction Management and Economics _vVolume 31, number 1-3 |
||
| 520 | 3 | _aThe design process has a significant impact on the performance and profitability of a housing project. Therefore, decisions made during the design process should take into consideration knowledge and experience from other processes in previously accomplished projects, specifically from the production phase. How to capture and use production experience in housing has not gained enough interest, possibly leading to sub-optimal improvements during the construction process. This motivates research on how onsite production experience from similar previous projects can be captured and used to improve constructability without risking customer values. Based on the concept of constructability, ‘design for manufacturing and assembly’ and the theory of waste, the method ‘design for construction’ (DFC) has been developed. The four-step model complements the conventional construction process, and consists of the following steps: (1) specify customer values and similar previous projects; (2) identify onsite waste and cost drivers in previous projects; (3) develop criteria to evaluate constructability; and (4) evaluate constructability of the design. The DFC method is exemplified and tested through a case study, in which it was shown that the method facilitated identification of all problems that were considered in the investigated project. The method also highlighted other project obstacles that potentially could have been solved to improve constructability. | |
| 650 |
_aConstructability _vDesign for construction _xLean construction |
||
| 700 | 1 |
_aBoqvist, Albert _eco-author |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aBjelkemyr, Marcus _eco-author |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aLindberg, Bengt _eco-author |
|
| 856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2012.756142 | ||
| 942 |
_2lcc _cJA |
||
| 999 |
_c165724 _d165724 |
||