000			01522nam a22002417a 4500
003			ZW-GwMSU
005			20240528131214.0
008			240528b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
022			_a01446193
040			_aMSU _bEnglish _cMSU _erda
050	0	0	_aHD9715. A1 CON
100	1		_aChang Chen-Yu _eauthor
245	1	2	_aA critical review of the application of TCE in the interpretation of risk allocation in PPP contracts _ccreated by Chen-Yu Chang
264	1		_aAbingdon: _bTaylor and Francis, _c2013
336			_2rdacontent _atext _btxt
337			_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn
338			_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc
440			_aConstruction Management and Economics _vVolume31, number 1-3
520	3		_aAlong with the rise of public–private partnerships (PPPs) as a mainstream procurement system, we have seen a growing interest in studies of risk allocation in these projects. One of the serious academic endeavours is to apply both transaction cost economics (TCE) and the resource-based view (RBV) to explain risk allocation patterns found in PPP projects. The existing literature along these lines is deficient in three aspects: inappropriate choice of unit of analysis; poor specification of governance structure; and misinterpretation of asset specificity. A way for improvement is to analyse risk allocation in the context of PPP procurement in its entirety.
650			_aApplication of TCE _vInterpretation of risk _xAllocation in PPP contracts
856			_u10.1080/01446193.2012.726365.
942			_2lcc _cJA
999			_c165717 _d165717