000 | 02439nam a22002537a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | ZW-GwMSU | ||
005 | 20240528121147.0 | ||
008 | 240528b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
022 | _a01446193 | ||
040 |
_aMSU _bEnglish _cMSU _erda |
||
050 | 0 | 0 | _aHD9715.A1 CON |
100 | 1 |
_aHåkansson, Håkan _eauthor |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aIndustrial renewal within the construction network _ccreated by Håkan Håkansson and Malena Ingemansson |
264 | 1 |
_aAbingdon: _bTaylor and Francis, _c2013 |
|
336 |
_2rdacontent _atext _btxt |
||
337 |
_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn |
||
338 |
_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc |
||
440 |
_aConstruction Management and Economics _vVolume 31, number 1-3 |
||
520 | 3 | _aThe construction business network is generally seen as conservative and non-innovative, for which a number of reasons have been identified. One of these reasons relates to the special inter-organizational setting that exists within the industry. The starting point of our study was to investigate whether there is any truth in this perceived lack of innovation. One reason for the industry’s bad reputation could be that the way innovation generally is defined and measured is unsuitable for the construction business. Therefore, renewal was used as the central concept of change in our investigation. The second issue concerns factors that either assist or impede renewal, and the ambition was to identify those factors driving, as well as those hindering renewal. In order to identify the degree of renewal, as well as the factors affecting it, we conducted a survey of Swedish construction companies. The resulting picture shows a clear connection between the inter-organizational interfaces within the industry and how renewal takes place. The total renewal activity is on a considerable level with more than 60% having made changes visible from the customer’s point of view. The most active interface is also in relation to customers, while the relationship to suppliers generally is more distant. Finally, the project focus which characterizes the industry affects what type of renewal takes place, and exposes the lack of knowledge transfer between individual projects and actors as an important hindrance to renewal in the construction network. | |
650 |
_aInnovation _vInter-firm collaboration _xKnowledge flows |
||
700 | 1 |
_aIngemansson, Malena _eco-author |
|
856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2012.737470 | ||
942 |
_2lcc _cJA |
||
999 |
_c165712 _d165712 |