000 02320nam a22002417a 4500
003 ZW-GwMSU
005 20240523085406.0
008 240523b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
022 _a00014273
040 _aMSU
_bEnglish
_cMSU
_erda
050 0 0 _aHD28 ACA
100 1 _aDesai, Vinit M.
_eauthor
245 1 4 _aThe behavioral theory of the (governed) firm:
_bcorporate board influences on organizations’ responses to performance shortfalls
_ccreated by
264 1 _aNew York:
_bAcademy of management,
_c2016
336 _2rdacontent
_atext
_btxt
337 _2rdamedia
_aunmediated
_bn
338 _2rdacarrier
_avolume
_bnc
440 _aAcademy of management journal
_vVolume 59, number 3
520 3 _aThe Behavioral Theory of the Firm provides a well-evidenced perspective on organizational decision making that has influenced a wide array of literatures, including the substantial body of work on organizational change. This literature suggests that organizations are more likely to undertake major changes when their performance declines below aspirations or targets for acceptable performance, but few studies examine how multiple groups of organizational decision makers, each with potentially conflicting interests, might collectively influence this process. To that end, I incorporate theory regarding corporate boards and their role in organizational decision making. I use this integration to suggest that boards with particular characteristics may have interests that do not align with those of the management team when performance shortfalls occur, using their influence to force compromises or compel managers to reconsider particular changes. I find support for the related predictions that an increase in board size and equity ownership suppresses change when performance drops, although I find no support for similar arguments regarding board turnover. This approach blends the typically distinct but related literatures on performance feedback and corporate governance, and suggests the role that some boards might play in circumventing the momentum for organizational change.
650 _aFirm performance, Organizational change
_vOrganizational decision-making
_xBoard of directors, Hospital, United States
_zUnited States
856 _uhttps://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0948
942 _2lcc
_cJA
999 _c165630
_d165630