000 | 01544nam a22002417a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | ZW-GwMSU | ||
005 | 20240521073053.0 | ||
008 | 240521b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
022 | _a08887233 | ||
040 |
_aMSU _bEnglish _cMSU _erda |
||
050 | 0 | 0 | _aHB90 COM |
100 | 1 |
_aMoschella, Manuela _eauthor |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aMexico and the IMF in the 1990s: _bold and new issues on capital account liberalization and emerging market countries _ccreated by Manuela Moschella |
264 | 1 |
_aHampshire, _bPalgrave Macmillan: _c2010 |
|
336 |
_2rdacontent _atext _btxt |
||
337 |
_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn |
||
338 |
_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc |
||
440 |
_aComparative economic studies _vVolume 52, number 4 |
||
520 | 3 | _aThe 2007–2008 financial crisis has once again prompted a lively debate on the benefits and risks of capital account liberalization in emerging market countries. This paper contributes to this debate by looking back at the 1990s through the lenses of the International Monetary Fund (IMF). On the basis of archival research, the paper argues that the IMF looked at Mexico as evidence of the benefits of global financial integration both before and after the 1994 crisis, focusing on macroeconomic conditions and underestimating the soundness of the domestic financial sector. In the conclusions, the paper links the findings with the debate that followed the subprime crisis. | |
650 |
_aIMF lending _vFinancial market regulation _xFinancial crisis _zMexico |
||
856 | _3https://doi.org/10.1057/ces.2010.18 | ||
942 |
_2lcc _cJA |
||
999 |
_c165569 _d165569 |