000			02043nam a22002897a 4500
003			ZW-GwMSU
005			20240519065704.0
008			240519b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
022			_a0143831X
040			_aMSU _bEnglish _cMSU _erda
050	0	0	_aHD5650 EID
100	1		_aNotelaers, Guy _eauthor
245	1	0	_aTesting the strain hypothesis of the Demand Control Model (DCM) to explain severe bullying at work/ _ccreated by Guy Notelaers, Elfi Baillien, Hans De Witte, Ståle Einarsen and Jeroen K. Vermunt
264	1		_aLos Angeles: _bSage, _c2013.
336			_2rdacontent _atext _btxt
337			_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn
338			_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc
440			_aEconomic and industrial democracy _vVolume 34, number 1
520	3		_aWorkplace bullying has often been attributed to work-related stress, and has been linked to the Job Demand Control Model. The current study aims to further these studies by testing the model for bullying in a heterogeneous sample and by using latent class (LC)-analyses to define different demands and control groups and targets of severe bullying. High job demands were associated with a higher probability of being a target of severe bullying, which was particularly true for the very high job demands group. Low job control was also associated with a higher probability of being a target of severe bullying. Moreover, high job control buffered the negative effects of job demands on being a target of severe bullying, particularly when employees reported very little job control and high/very high job demands. Overall, the JDC-Model was supported, suggesting that being a target of severe bullying can be considered as a social behavioural strain.
650			_aJob content _vQuality of work life _xWorkplace bullying _zBelgium
700	1		_aBaillien, Elfi _eco author
700	1		_aDe Witte, Hans _eco author
700	1		_aEinarsen, Ståle Valvatne _eco author
700	1		_aVermunt, Jeroen K. _eco author
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X12438742
942			_2lcc _cJA
999			_c165524 _d165524