000			01703nam a22002417a 4500
003			ZW-GwMSU
005			20240518134150.0
008			240518b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
022			_a0143831X
040			_aMSU _bEnglish _cMSU _erda
050	0	0	_aHD5650 EID
100	1		_aHeyes, Jason _eauthor
245	1	0	_aVocational training, employability and the post-2008 jobs crisis: _bresponses in the European Union/ _ccreated by Jason Heyes
264	1		_aLos Angeles: _bSage, _c2013.
336			_2rdacontent _atext _btxt
337			_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn
338			_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc
440			_aEconomic and industrial democracy _vVolume 34, number 2
520	3		_aVocational education and training measures have featured prominently in the responses of EU member states to the economic crisis that erupted in 2008. Existing training programmes have been expanded and new programmes introduced. In addition, employers and trade unions have negotiated new entitlements to education and training. This article explores the various training measures that have been adopted since the start of the crisis and compares countries with different types of training systems. Particular attention is paid to the UK, Ireland and Germany. The article also examines the role that training measures have played in governments’ active labour market programmes. While the European Commission has called for a ‘training-first’ approach to the unemployed, the article suggests that ‘work-first’ principles are becoming even more dominant.
650			_aEmployability _vHuman capital _xVocational training _zEuropean Union
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X12445624
942			_2lcc _cJA
999			_c165516 _d165516