000			01800nam a22002417a 4500
003			ZW-GwMSU
005			20240518122709.0
008			240518b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
022			_a0143831X
040			_aMSU _bEnglish _cMSU _erda
050	0	0	_aHD5650 EID
100	1		_aAsmuß, Birte _eauthor
245	1	0	_aThe emergence of symmetries and asymmetries in performance appraisal interviews: _ban interactional perspective/ _ccreated by Birte Asmuß
264	1		_aLos Angeles: _bSage: _c2013.
336			_2rdacontent _atext _btxt
337			_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn
338			_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc
440			_aEconomic and industrial democracy _vVolume 34, number 3
520	3		_aPerformance appraisal interviews (PAI) are in a Scandinavian context supposed to be dialogues between equal partners. This implies a focus on the superior and subordinate as conducting a conversation more than an interview, and a focus on development instead of performance. The article seeks to investigate how these ideals are lived up to in the practice of conducting a PAI. On the basis of a corpus of 30 hours of videotaped PAIs and applying a conversation analytical approach, the study shows that interactional symmetries and asymmetries can arise as a consequence of interactional practices that are dynamically negotiated between and agreed upon by the co-participants on a turn-by-turn basis. These symmetries and asymmetries emerge due to the participants’ orientations to institutional and social norms that can intertwine and overlap, thus impeding, postponing or supporting the ideals of PAIs as being dialogues between equal partners.
650			_aEquality _vPerformance management _xSymmetries and asymmetries
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X13489045
942			_2lcc _cJA
999			_c165508 _d165508