000			01934nam a22002417a 4500
003			ZW-GwMSU
005			20240518121411.0
008			240518b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
022			_a0143831X
040			_aMSU _bEnglish _cMSU _erda
050			_aHD5650 EID
100	1		_aStokoe, Elizabeth _eauthor
245	1	0	_aApplying findings and creating impact from conversation analytic studies of gender and communication/ _ccreated by Elizabeth Stokoe
264	1		_aLos Angeles: _bSage, _c2013.
336			_2rdacontent _atext _btxt
337			_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn
338			_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc
440			_aEconomic and industrial democracy _vVolume 34, number 3
520	3		_aStudies of workplaces frequently focus on gender, investigating and challenging inequality. In that many studies start with ‘gender’ as a taken-for-granted category, measuring gender differences in organizational life, or interviewing participants to elicit accounts of their employment experiences, they exaggerate and even create stereotypical ‘common knowledge’ about gender. In contrast, this article illustrates a conversation analytic approach which can show if, when and how gender becomes consequentially relevant within any given communicative encounter. Drawing on a large corpus of institutional interaction, the article demonstrates two things: that (1) robust claims about the gendering of social life can be made once those claims are grounded in what people actually do; and (2) systematic patterns in people’s endogenous orientations to gender can be found in communication. Finally, the article showcases a real-world application of conversation analytic work, demonstrating the impact and relevance of such research programmes for understanding everyday gendered social life.
650			_aApplied research _vConversation analysis _xGender
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X134890
942			_2lcc _cJA
999			_c165506 _d165506