000			01909nam a22002537a 4500
003			ZW-GwMSU
005			20240518101037.0
008			240518b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
022			_a0143831X
040			_aMSU _bEnglish _cMSU _erda
050	0	0	_aHD5650 EID
100	1		_aPerrons, Diane _eauthor
245	1	0	_aRegional development, equality and gender: _bmoving towards more inclusive and socially sustainable measures/ _ccreated by Diane Perrons and Robin Dunford
264	1		_aLos Angeles: _bSage, _c2013.
336			_2rdacontent _atext _btxt
337			_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn
338			_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc
440			_aEconomic and industrial democracy _vVolume 34, number 3
520	3		_aAs the efficacy of the neoliberal model is now in question this is an appropriate moment to consider ‘what kind of regional development and for whom?’, or, as the authors interpret it, what kind of development model would be inclusive and economically and socially sustainable. Current indicators of regional performance are based on growth alone, overlook distribution and so misrepresent the performance of regions in terms of social well-being. An alternative, more inclusive measure of regional development and a gender sensitive variant are calculated for UK regions. On these measures London falls from the top ranked region to a middle rank on the regional development indicator and on the gender sensitive variant falls to the lowest position, arguably better reflecting the experience of life in this region. Optimistically, use of these measures would lead to more inclusive models of development that would render the more contentious social, redistributive policies less necessary.
650			_aEconomic change _vSocial inclusion/exclusion _xRegional development
700	1		_aDunford, Robin _eco author
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X13489044
942			_2lcc _cJA
999			_c165503 _d165503