000 | 01735nam a22002417a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | ZW-GwMSU | ||
005 | 20240510123620.0 | ||
008 | 240510b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
022 | _a1016-8737 | ||
040 |
_aMSU _bEnglish _cMSU _erda |
||
050 | 0 | 0 | _aHB1A1 INT |
100 | 1 |
_aPrasada, D. V. Pahan _eauthor |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aDomestic versus multilateral instiutions in bilateral trade : _ba comparative gravity analysis _ccreated by D. V. Pahan Prasada |
264 | 1 |
_aAbingdon: _bTaylor and Francis, _c2013 |
|
336 |
_2rdacontent _atext _btxt |
||
337 |
_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn |
||
338 |
_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc |
||
440 |
_aInternational economic journal _vVolume 27, number 2 |
||
520 | 3 | _aThe role of domestic and multilateral institutional variables in determining bilateral trade is estimated using recent cross-sectional data covering 192 countries. Linear estimations are conducted using lognormal and Tobit models while multiplicative models use Poisson and hurdle Poisson-logit estimators. The multiple indices of domestic institutional quality available are scaled into four categories using multidimensional scaling. Membership of trade and political organizations proxy for multilateral institutional heterogeneity. Count data models a report better model fit and conservative estimates compared with linear estimations. Domestic institutional quality has a significant but moderate association with bilateral trade while multilateral institutions have a substantially large and statistically significant association with trade. | |
650 |
_aInstitutions _vGovernance, Comparative gravity analysis _xTrade agreements, Gravitations model |
||
856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1080/10168737.2012.719919 | ||
942 |
_2lcc _cJA |
||
999 |
_c165416 _d165416 |