000 | 01545nam a22002417a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | ZW-GwMSU | ||
005 | 20240508121254.0 | ||
008 | 240508b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
022 | _a10168737 | ||
040 |
_aMSU _bEnglish _cMSU _erda |
||
050 | 0 | 0 | _aHB1A1 INT |
100 | 1 |
_aCandau, Fabien _eauthor |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aTrade, FDI and migration _ccreated by Fabien Candau |
264 | 1 |
_aAbingdon: _bTaylor and Francis, _c2013 |
|
336 |
_2rdacontent _atext _btxt |
||
337 |
_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn |
||
338 |
_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc |
||
440 |
_aInternational economic journal _vVolume 27, number 3 |
||
520 | 3 | _aThis article provides a theoretical synthesis of the New Economic Geography to analyse the links between trade, FDI and migrations. We find that liberalizing from high trade costs, a country can attract both capital and labour – the bifurcation pattern is a gradual peripheral exodus of workers associated with capital flight from the periphery – but after a threshold of trade costs, opening trade generates return migration toward the periphery while capital remains agglomerated in the core. The model is built on the assumption that factors are sector specific. By relaxing this assumption and by providing a second model where workers are mobile between industries (vertically linked) but also between countries we confirm this result. | |
650 |
_aEconomic geography _vMigration costs _xForeign investment, International migration, Theory |
||
856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1080/10168737.2012.676058 | ||
942 |
_2lcc _cJA |
||
999 |
_c165359 _d165359 |