000 | 01704nam a22002417a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | ZW-GwMSU | ||
005 | 20240415081109.0 | ||
008 | 240415b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
022 | _a09318658 | ||
040 |
_aMSU _bEnglish _cMSU _erda |
||
050 | 0 | 0 | _aHB171.5 JOU |
100 | 1 |
_aZhang Lin _eauthor |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aSaving and retirement behavior under quasi-hyperbolic discounting _ccreated by Lin Zhang |
264 | 1 |
_aHeidelberg: _bSpringer, _c2013 |
|
336 |
_2rdacontent _atext _btxt |
||
337 |
_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn |
||
338 |
_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc |
||
440 |
_aJournal of economics _vVolume 109, number 1 |
||
520 | 3 | _aThis paper investigates saving and retirement behavior using a quasi-hyperbolic discounting model with endogenous labor supply. The behavior of quasi-hyperbolic-discounting consumers is compared with optimal behavior, which is obtained under exponential discounting. The quasi-hyperbolic discounters, whether naïve or sophisticated, under-save and retire early compared with an exponential discounter, if and only if the present-biased marginal utility of future consumption decreases with stronger present bias. Logarithmic utility functions and constant-absolute-risk-aversion utility functions can both exhibit this property. In other words, quasi-hyperbolic discounting explains why, consistent with previous empirical studies, under-savers might also be early retirers. Under logarithmic utility, a wage tax and an interest subsidy can counteract the under-saving and early retirement and improve consumer welfare. | |
650 |
_aSaving and retirement _vQuasi-hyperbolic discounting _xIntertemporal choice |
||
856 | _u10.1007/s00712-012-0302-8 | ||
942 |
_2lcc _cJA |
||
999 |
_c164857 _d164857 |