000			01864nam a22002417a 4500
003			ZW-GwMSU
005			20240410090448.0
008			240410b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
022			_a10704965
040			_aMSU _bEnglish _cMSU _erda
050	0	0	_aHC79 JOU
100	1		_aPhilipp H. Pattberg _eauthor
245	1	4	_aThe forest stewardship council: _bRisk and potential of private forest governance _ccreated by Philipp H. Pattberg
264	1		_aTHousand Oaks: _bSAGE, _c2005
336			_2rdacontent _atext _btxt
337			_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn
338			_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc
440			_aThe journal of environment & development _vVolume 14, number 3
520	3		_aAmong the many organizations active in the forestry sector, the Forest Stewardship Council is claimed to be one of the most effective, in terms of its effect on forestry and the political discourse. This article takes the first decade of private forest politics as a starting point for an assessment of the advantages and disadvantages of private systems of rules operating on the transnational level. It points to four open questions: (a) the problem of uneven geographic representation and the resulting disadvantages for developing countries; (b) the question of long-term financial support for private politics; (c) the problem of competing schemes and the resulting contradictory signals toward consumers and policy makers; and (d) generic structural limitations to market-based governance. These empirical observations, derived from analyzing one prominent private system, are generalized to a wider set of private systems of rules operating at the global level to assess the future of private governance in sustainability politics.
650			_aGlobal forest politics _vPrivate Governance _xEnvironmental politics
856			_u10.1177/1070496505280062
942			_2lcc _cJA
999			_c164757 _d164757