000 | 01982nam a22002537a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | ZW-GwMSU | ||
005 | 20240408132847.0 | ||
008 | 240408b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
022 | _a10704965 | ||
040 |
_aMSU _bEnglish _cMSU _erda |
||
050 | 0 | 0 | _aHC79 JOU |
100 | 1 |
_aPellegrini Lorenzo _eauthor |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aCorruption, democracy, and environmental policy: _bAn empirical contribution to the debate _ccreated by Lorenzo Pellegrini and Reyer Gerlagh |
264 | 1 |
_aThousand Oaks: _bSAGE, _c2006 |
|
336 |
_2rdacontent _atext _btxt |
||
337 |
_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn |
||
338 |
_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc |
||
440 |
_aThe journal of environment & development _vVolume 15, number 3 |
||
520 | 3 | _aTheoretical and empirical studies have shown that democracy and corruption influence environmental policies. In this article, the authors empirically analyze the relative importance of these determinants of environmental policy. When these variables are jointly included as explanatory variables in a multiple regression analysis, the authors found that corruption stands out as a substantial and significant determinant of environmental policies, while proxies for democracy have an insignificant impact. Nevertheless, democracy could affect environmental policy stringency given that countries with a history of democratic rule tend to be less corrupted. The authors argue that improving environmental quality following increasing income is less probable in developing countries with institutional disarray. Finally, and more optimistically, when considering the results in the context of institutions and growth, the authors conclude that there is scope for reaping a double dividend, when institutional improvements and reductions in corruption induce higher economic growth rates and stricter environmental policies. | |
650 |
_aCorruption _vDemocracy _xDevelopment |
||
700 | 1 |
_aGerlagh, Reyer _eco-author |
|
856 | _u10.1177/1070496506290960 | ||
942 |
_2lcc _cJA |
||
999 |
_c164713 _d164713 |