000 | 01818nam a22002417a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | ZW-GwMSU | ||
005 | 20240408123832.0 | ||
008 | 240408b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
022 | _a10704965 | ||
040 |
_aMSU _bEnglish _cMSU _erda |
||
050 | _aHC79 JOU | ||
100 | 1 |
_aMitchell Ross E. _eauthor |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aEnvironmental actions of citizens: _bEvaluating the submission process of the commission for environmental cooperation of NAFTA _ccreated by Ross E. Mitchell |
264 | 1 |
_aThousand Oaks: _bSAGE, _c2006 |
|
336 |
_2rdacontent _atext _btxt |
||
337 |
_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn |
||
338 |
_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc |
||
440 |
_aThe journal of environment & development _vVolume 15, number 3 |
||
520 | 3 | _aThe Citizen Submissions on Enforcement Matters is administered by the North American Commission for Environmental Cooperation (CEC), a trilateral institution established by the governments of Canada, Mexico, and the United States as part of the North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation (NAAEC). The CEC received 55 submissions from June 1995 to May 2006, although these remain to be substantially discussed in the literature. This study fills in some of the gaps through an analysis of the submission process from an actor and results-based perspective. Two guiding questions form the basis for this article: What are some key demographic or geographical differences among “whistle-blowers” and has the submission process achieved its goals? The conclusion is that key differences among submitters are due to such interlinked factors as gender, place, and issue, which should be more carefully considered by the CEC and other related institutions to enhance effectiveness. | |
650 |
_aDemocracy _vEnvironment _xTrade |
||
856 | _u10.1177/1070496506291152 | ||
942 |
_2lcc _cJA |
||
999 |
_c164702 _d164702 |