000			01708nam a22002417a 4500
003			ZW-GwMSU
005			20240408101912.0
008			240408b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
022			_a10704965
040			_aMSU _bEnglish _cMSU _erda
050	0	0	_aHC79 JOU
100	1		_aMumme Stephen P. _eauthor
245	1	4	_aThe international boundary and water commission under fire: _bPolicy prospective for the 21st century _ccreated by Stephen P. Mumme
264	1		_aThousand Oaks: _bSAGE, _c2005
336			_2rdacontent _atext _btxt
337			_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn
338			_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc
440			_aThe journal of environment & development _vVolume 14, number 4
520	3		_aThe venerable International Boundary and Water Commission, United States and Mexico, established by the landmark 1944 U.S.-Mexican Water Treaty, has come under fire in the past decade for a range of alleged institutional deficiencies. These deficiencies, ranging from the adequacy of its mandate to its organizational structure and management, are seen as limiting its diplomatic and administrative capacity to promote cooperative solutions to a range of binational water problems including drought, ecological conservation, and planning for sustainable water use and management in the 21st century. This article reviews this recent spate of criticisms and reform recommendations, addressing their feasibility and practicality. It argues that many of these proposals are treaty consistent and have sufficient merit to warrant serious consideration by the two governments.
650			_aInternational boundary _vWater commission _xWatershed management
856			_u10.1177/1070496505282123
942			_2lcc _cJA
999			_c164688 _d164688