000 | 01449nam a22002417a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | ZW-GwMSU | ||
005 | 20240319132741.0 | ||
008 | 240319b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
040 |
_aMSU _bEnglish _cMSU _erda |
||
050 | _aHB119 ECO | ||
100 | 1 |
_aTatjana Chudjakow & Frank Riedel _eauthor |
|
245 | 1 | 4 |
_aThe best choice problem under ambiguity _cby Tatjana Chudjakow and Frank Riedel |
264 | 1 |
_aHeildelberg : _bSpringer, _c2013 |
|
336 |
_2rdacontent _atext _btxt |
||
337 |
_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn |
||
338 |
_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc |
||
440 |
_aEconomic theory _vVolume 54, number 1 |
||
520 | _aWe model and solve best choice problems in the multiple prior framework: An ambiguity averse decision maker aims to choose the best among a fixed number of applicants that appear sequentially in a random order. The agent faces ambiguity about the probability that a candidate—a relatively top applicant—is actually best among all applicants. We show that our model covers the classical secretary problem, but also other interesting classes of problems. We provide a closed form solution of the problem for time-consistent priors using backward induction. As in the classical case, the derived stopping strategy is simple. Ambiguity can lead to substantial differences to the classical threshold rule. | ||
650 | _aAmbiguity | ||
700 |
_aRiedel, Frank _eco-author |
||
856 | _u10.1007/s00199-012-0715-1 | ||
942 |
_2lcc _cJA |
||
999 |
_c164453 _d164453 |