000 | 01830nam a22002777a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | ZW-GwMSU | ||
005 | 20240318091145.0 | ||
008 | 240318b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
022 | _a00222186 | ||
040 |
_aMSU _bEnglish _cMSU _erda |
||
050 | 0 | 0 | _aHB73 JOU |
100 | 1 |
_aGiné, Xavier _eauthor |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aDo Reorganization Costs Matter for Efficiency? _bevidence from a Bankruptcy Reform in Colombia _ccreated by Xavier Giné and Inessa Love |
264 | 1 |
_aChicago: _bUniversity of Chicago Press, _c2010. |
|
336 |
_2rdacontent _atext _btxt |
||
337 |
_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn |
||
338 |
_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc |
||
440 |
_aJournal of Law and Economics _vVolume 53, number 4 |
||
520 | 3 | _aAn efficient bankruptcy system should liquidate nonviable businesses and reorganize viable ones. The importance of this filtering process has long been recognized in the literature; the typical reason advanced for its failure has been biases (in codes or among judges). In this paper we show that bankruptcy costs can be another source of such filtering failure. We illustrate this with the Colombian reform of 1999. Using data from 1,924 firms filing for bankruptcy between 1996 and 2003, we find that the pre reform reorganization proceedings were so inefficient that the bankruptcy system failed to separate economically viable firms from inefficient ones. In contrast, by streamlining the reorganization process, the reform contributed to the improvement of the selection of viable firms into reorganization. In this sense, the new law increased the efficiency of the bankruptcy system in Colombia. | |
650 | _aBanks and Banking Reform | ||
650 | _aCorporate Law | ||
650 | _aEconomic Theory and Research | ||
700 | 1 |
_aLove, Inessa _eco author |
|
856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1086/605848 | ||
942 |
_2lcc _cJA |
||
999 |
_c164399 _d164399 |