000			01915nam a22002777a 4500
003			ZW-GwMSU
005			20240311104228.0
008			240311b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
022			_a00222186
040			_aMSU _bEnglish _cMSU _erda
050			_aHB73 JOU
100	1		_aLandes, William M. _eauthor
245	1	0	_aMeasuring Coase’s Influence _ccreated by William M. Landes and Sonia Lahr-Pastor
264			_aChicago: _bUniversity of Chicago Press; _c2011.
336			_2rdacontent _atext _btxt
337			_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn
338			_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc
440			_aJournal of Law and Economics _vVolume 54, number 4
520			_aThis paper considers Ronald Coase’s legacy through citation analysis. Our goal, however, is not simply to confirm that Coase is highly cited but to examine other aspects of Coase’s influence that can be revealed by citation analysis. For example, we look at the durability of his work, the highly concentrated nature of his influence, his influence in economics as opposed to law and how he has fared in economics textbooks and judicial opinions. We also compare Coase with two groups of scholars: other Nobel Prize winners in economics and highly cited law and economics scholars. We find that Coase is cited frequently in both law and economics, compared with peer scholars in both fields. Although his influence is highly concentrated, he is nevertheless among the most cited scholars in all three fields. His ideas are also widely referenced in judicial opinions and textbooks, which is further evidence of the lasting influence of his work
650			_aBibliographic citations _vCitation analysis _xCoefficients
650			_aJudges _vJudicial rulings _xLaw schools
650			_aLegal citations _vNobel Prizes _xRegression coefficients
700			_aLahr-Pastor, Sonia _eco author
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1086/666478
942			_2lcc _cJA
999			_c164248 _d164248