000 | 01781nam a22002897a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | ZW-GwMSU | ||
005 | 20240304132955.0 | ||
008 | 240304b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
022 | _a00222186 | ||
040 |
_aMSU _benglish _cMSU _erda |
||
050 | _aHB73 JOU | ||
100 | 1 | 0 |
_aPrasad, Kislaya _eauthor |
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aEconomic liberalization and violent crime _cby Kislaya Prasad |
264 |
_aChicago: _bUniversity of Chicago Press; _c2012. |
||
336 |
_2rdacontent _atext _btxt |
||
337 |
_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn |
||
338 |
_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc |
||
440 |
_aJournal of law and ecomics _vVolume 55, number 4 |
||
520 | _aI study the effect of economic liberalization on violent crime. The particular emphasis is on the case of India, where, in the years following 1991, there was a virtual dismantling of controls on entry and production in registered manufacturing. This was accompanied by a significant reduction in impediments to foreign trade and access to foreign exchange. Economic controls create an incentive for illegal trade, and a frequent by-product of illegal trade is violent crime. Consequently, violent crimes such as murders would be expected to decline following market-based reforms. Analysis of aggregate all-India data, as well as data at the state level, suggests that economic reforms did indeed lead to a reduction in violent crime. I extend the analysis to a panel of countries and find strong evidence that greater trade openness is negatively related to violent crime | ||
650 |
_aGross domestic product _zIndia |
||
650 |
_aManufacturing output _zIndia |
||
650 |
_aTrade legislation _zIndia |
||
650 |
_aTrade restrictions _zIndia |
||
650 |
_aViolent crimes _zIndia |
||
856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1086/666487 | ||
942 |
_2lcc _cJA |
||
999 |
_c164081 _d164081 |