000			01851nam a22002297a 4500
003			ZW-GwMSU
005			20240301094442.0
008			240229b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_aMSU _bEnglish _cMSU _erda
050			_aHB75 JOU
100	1		_aVan Horn, Robert _eauthor
245	1	0	_aHayek's unacknowlledged disciple: _ban exploration of the political and intellectual relationship of F.A. Hayek and Aaron Director (1945-1950) _cby Robert Van Horn
264			_aNew York : _bCambridge University ; _c© 2013.
336			_2rdacontent _atext _btxt
337			_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn
338			_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc
440			_vVolume 35 , number3 ,
520			_aNone of the existing scholarly literature has explored or appreciated Director’s great respect for Hayek or their relationship. This paper explores the relationship of Hayek and Director, and argues that Director should be viewed as a disciple of Hayek in the immediate post-war period. Newly available archival material in the Director Papers at the University of Chicago as well as material in the Hayek Papers allow for a deeper appreciation of their relationship than was previously possible. The archival record indicates that the central arc of their relationship occurred from 1945 to roughly 1950, when they heavily corresponded, and primarily focuses on this pivotal time period. Through exploring the relationship of Hayek and Director, this paper challenges the frequent claim that Hayek did not influence the post-war Chicago School, and argues that, starting in 1946, Hayek, even though he was not yet at Chicago, influenced the initial intellectual trajectory of the post-war Chicago School through his disciple Director.
650			_aPolitical and intellectual relationship
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1017/S1053837213000187
942			_2lcc _cJA
999			_c164005 _d164005