| 000 | 01545nam a22002297a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | ZW-GwMSU | ||
| 005 | 20240229131331.0 | ||
| 008 | 240229b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 040 |
_aMSU _bEnglish _cMSU _erda |
||
| 050 | _aHB73 JOU | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aLeeson, Peter T. _eauthor |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aVermin trials _cby Peter T. Leeson |
| 264 |
_aChicago : _bUniversity of Chicago Press; _c2013. |
||
| 336 |
_2rdacontent _atext _btxt |
||
| 337 |
_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn |
||
| 338 |
_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc |
||
| 440 |
_aThe Journal of Law and Economics _vVolume56 , number 3 |
||
| 520 | _aFor 250 years insects and rodents accused of committing property crimes were tried as legal persons in French, Italian, and Swiss ecclesiastic courts under the same laws and according to the same procedures used to try actual persons. I argue that the Catholic Church used vermin trials to increase tithe revenues where tithe evasion threatened to erode them. Vermin trials achieved this by bolstering citizens’ belief in the validity of Church punishments for tithe evasion: estrangement from God through sin, excommunication, and anathema. Vermin trials permitted ecclesiastics to evidence their supernatural sanctions’ legitimacy by producing outcomes that supported those sanctions’ validity. These outcomes strengthened citizens’ belief that the Church’s imprecations were real, which allowed ecclesiastics to reclaim jeopardized tithe revenue. | ||
| 650 |
_aInsects _xRodents |
||
| 856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1086/671480 | ||
| 942 |
_2lcc _cJA |
||
| 999 |
_c163940 _d163940 |
||